Scientific practical journal «Precious and Decorative Stones». 2021/N 2 (104)


ISSN 2079-1410
S. Taranenko, V. Nesterovskiy, O. Makhota.Interdisciplinary study of stone as a construction material in researches of monumental buildings during princely era
DOI: https://doi.org/10.53036/2021-2(104)-2
UDC 552.1:693+94(477)"9/14"


INTERDISCIPLINARY STUDY OF STONE AS A CONSTRUCTION
MATERIAL IN RESEARCHES OF MONUMENTAL BUILDINGS
DURING PRINCELY ERA




S. Taranenko, Ph.D., Head of the DepartmentSector of Archeology, NationalPreserveKyiv-PecherskLavra; 9 LavrskaStr., Kyiv, 01015, Ukraine. E-mail: taransun@ukr.net
V. Nesterovskiy, DrSc. (Geol.), Prof., Institute of Geology, National Taras Shevchenko University of Kyiv 90, Vasylkivska Str., Kyiv, 03022, Ukraine. E­mail: v.nesterovski@ukr.net
O. Makhota, Junior Research Fellow of the Research Sector of Archeology, National Preserve Kyiv-PecherskLavra; 9, Lavrska Str., Kyiv, 01015, Ukraine. E-mail: makhota-olena@ukr.net
Language: Ukrainian
Precious and Decorative Stones, № 2 (104), 2020: 7-13
Abstract. During the archeological study of monumental buildings of the princely era (10–15th centuries), almost every monument has natural stones as a building material. One of such examples is offered – walls of 12th century. Pechersk Monastery. They were first studied in 1951, and then three more times in different areas. At each of the excavations in the foundation, ditches recorded natural stones, which was part of their filling. A particular petrografi study was conducted only in 2018 in the Museum of Ceology National Taras Shevchenko University of Kyiv. The obtained information allows not only to reconstruct the stages of construction of the walls in the second half of the XII century partially, but also to obtain data on the economic life of the monastery.
Keywords: archaeology, fortification, Pechersk monastery, walls, natural stones.
(Recommended byI. Cherevko, Ph.D. (Geol.))
References:
1. Ananeva T. Dnevnik Kondrata Lohvitskogo // Kievskiy Albom. Istoricheskiy almanah. 2001. – K. :Praym, 2001. – Vyip. 1. – S. 33–40.
2. Balakin S. A. Zvit pro rezultaty arkheolohichnykh doslidzhen na terytorii Natsionalnoho Kyievo-Pecherskoho istoryko kulturnoho zapovidnyka u 2007 r. KPL-A-NDF-699.
3. Bogusevich V. A. Arheologicheskie raskopki v zapovednike Kievo-Pecherskoy lavryi v 1951 g. – K., 1951. – Ark. 1. NA IA NAN Ukraini, № 1951/8a.
4. Bolhovitinov E. Opisanie Kievo-Sofiyskogo soborai Kievskoyi erarhii. – K., 1825.
5. Voronin N.N. Oboronitelnyiesooruzheniya Vladimira XII v. OCR Halgar Fenrirssonpo Materialyii issledovaniya po arheologii drevnerusskih gorodov № 11. Tom I. Po red. N. N. Voronina. Moskva, Leningrad, Izdatelstvo AN SSSR, 1949, s. 201–243.
6. Yolshin D.D., Nikitenko I.S. O fundamentah Desyatinnoy tserkvi v Kieve (po materialam issledovaniy stroitelnogo kamnya) // Zapiski Instituta istorii materialnoy kulturyi Rossiyskoy Akademii nauk (IIMK RAN). – 2009. – № 4. – S. 138–156.
7. Karger M.K. Drevniy Kiev, t. 2, s. 206–213; Rappoport P. Russkaya arhitektura H–HIII vv. Katalog pamyatnikov // Arheologiya SSSR / SAI. – Leningrad, 1982. – Vyip. 1–47. – S. 6–116; Movchan I.I., Borovskyi Ya.Ie., Klimovskyi S.I., Honchar V.M., Sytomiatnykov O.K. Novi doslidzhennia starodavnoho Kyieva («mistoYaroslava») // Arkheolohichni vidkryttia Ukrainy v 1998-1999 rr. // Zbirkanaukovykh prats / Pid red. D.N. Kozaka, N. O. Havryliuk K. IA NANU, 1999. – S. 28–31.
8. Kirpichnikov A.N. 1) Ladoga i Pereyaslavl Yuzhnyiy — drevneyshie kamennyie kreposti na Rusi. – Pamyatniki kulturyi, Novyie otkryitiya, Ezhegodnik 1977, M., 1977, s. 417–427; 2)
Full text [in Ukrainian]
 
© 2007-2018 SGCU. Scientific and practical journal «Precious and Decorative Stones». SGCU, 04119, Кyiv, Degtyarivska st., 38-44